Services
Six engagements.
All of them invisible to your client.
Each is a defined piece of work with a start, milestones and a handover. Pricing is quoted per engagement after a 20-minute call, because a client portal and a Webflow migration are not the same job.
Vibe Code to Production
We take applications built in Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor or a no-code tool and rebuild what production actually requires: real architecture, authentication, databases, error handling, integrations and testing, shipped under your agency's brand.
A prototype that demos perfectly can leak data, break the moment a second user signs in, and have no error handling anywhere in the stack. Lovable, Bolt, v0 and Cursor are very good at producing something that looks finished. They are not designed to produce something that survives real accounts, real load or a real integration, and the gap between the two is invisible until a client is depending on it.
- Who it is for
- AI and no-code agencies holding a client app that demoed well and is not safe to launch.
- Typical timeline
- A focused rebuild typically runs three to eight weeks depending on how much of the prototype is salvageable.
Included
- Architecture review and rebuild plan for the generated codebase
- Proper authentication, sessions and access control
- Production database design, migrated off whatever the tool scaffolded
- Error handling, input validation and logging throughout
- Third-party integrations the prototype faked or stubbed
- Automated tests for the paths that matter
- Deployment, environments and monitoring
- A written map of what changed and why, for your team and your client
Not included
- Keeping the original code unchanged where it is not safe to
- Visual redesign, unless the rebuild requires it
- Ongoing product management
- Guarantees that every generated feature survives the rebuild intact
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- You need this once per client, not as a standing role. Bringing in someone who has rebuilt generated code before is faster than a new hire learning the failure modes on your client's project.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- Rebuilding a vibe-coded app rewards someone who has seen where these tools cut corners. That judgement is the deliverable, not the typing.
- Against a no-code build
- When a client has outgrown the no-code ceiling entirely, patching it further just delays the rebuild. We tell you honestly when that point has been reached.
Engineering Capacity
We add senior React, Next.js and backend engineering capacity to agencies that have sold more development work than their team can absorb, working inside your tools and under your brand, for the length of the project rather than a permanent headcount.
You closed the work. Your developer is booked until the week the client expects a demo. Hiring takes six to twelve weeks and commits you to a salary long after this project ends. Turning it down costs you the client, and usually the retainer attached to them.
- Who it is for
- Agencies of 2 to 50 people holding a signed build they cannot resource this quarter, who do not want a permanent hire to cover a temporary gap.
- Typical timeline
- Pilot milestone inside the first week. Full builds typically run four to twelve weeks depending on scope.
Included
- React and Next.js application development
- Node.js and NestJS APIs and backend services
- Database design, multi-tenancy and role-based access control
- Third-party API and service integration
- Authentication, permissions and account management
- SaaS dashboards and internal tools
- Deployment, environments and CI pipelines
- Code review and written handover documentation
- Work inside your Slack, GitHub and project board
Not included
- Any direct contact with your client
- Brand, visual design and copywriting
- Paid media, SEO and marketing execution
- 24/7 on-call support
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- No recruitment cycle, no salary commitment, no bench cost when the project ends. Senior capacity for the length of the engagement, stopping cleanly.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- A lead engineer directing a small, vetted team in your tools and reporting against milestones, rather than re-explaining your business to a new person every engagement.
- Against an offshore shop
- You talk directly to the engineer running your build, not an account manager relaying requirements down a chain, and never an undisclosed swap to a junior mid-project.
AI Features & Agents
We build the production AI systems behind what your agency has sold: RAG, tool-calling agents, multi-agent systems, AI SaaS features and real-time voice agents, with the evaluation, cost control and human handoff paths a demo doesn't need but a client does.
A prototype that works in a demo is roughly a tenth of the job. Production AI needs evaluation, cost control, validation of non-deterministic output, a sensible context strategy, and a defined answer for what happens when the model returns something wrong. Most AI work fails in exactly that gap.
- Who it is for
- AI agencies and product agencies whose clients are asking for AI functionality deeper than a chat widget.
- Typical timeline
- A scoped AI feature usually ships in two to six weeks. RAG across a large existing corpus, and voice agent builds, are scoped after the fit call.
Included
- AI chat interfaces with streaming responses
- RAG pipelines: ingestion, chunking, embeddings, vector search on pgvector or Pinecone
- Tool-calling and multi-agent systems
- MCP servers and tool integration
- Schema-constrained output with validation before side effects
- Token cost modelling, caching and per-account ceilings
- Evaluation harnesses for output quality
- Voice agents: real-time conversational agents on Vapi or Retell, telephony via Twilio, latency budgeting across the turn, tool calling into calendars and CRMs, and escalation paths to a human
- AI-disclosure handling for the EU AI Act's Article 50 transparency obligations, in force 2 August 2026
Not included
- Training or fine-tuning foundation models from scratch
- AI strategy decks with no implementation attached
- Data labelling operations
- Guarantees about model accuracy, which no honest engineer offers
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- You get an engineer who has already shipped multi-agent architecture, structured output validation and token-cost control, instead of paying a new hire to learn those lessons on your client's project.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- The deliverable is a production feature with cost controls and failure handling, not a notebook that cannot survive real traffic.
- Against an offshore shop
- AI work rewards judgement about what not to build. That judgement sits with the engineer, and here you have direct access to them.
Integrations & Automation
We connect the systems your client already runs (CRMs, calendars, webhooks, APIs) and automate the work between them with n8n, Make or custom backend logic, including the retry, replay and rate-limit handling that no-code automation tools quietly skip.
n8n and Make get an integration working in a demo in an afternoon. They do not, by default, handle a webhook that arrives twice, an API that rate-limits mid-run, or a sync that needs to resume cleanly after a partial failure. Those are exactly the failures a client notices, usually as missing data rather than an error message.
- Who it is for
- Automation agencies whose projects need engineering beyond what a no-code automation tool can hold.
- Typical timeline
- A scoped integration typically runs one to four weeks. Multi-system automation projects are scoped after the fit call.
Included
- CRM, calendar and third-party API integrations
- Webhook ingestion: signature verification, deduplication, idempotency
- n8n and Make workflow design and custom nodes
- Business-process automation beyond what no-code tools can express
- Custom backend logic where a workflow tool is the wrong shape
- Data synchronisation between systems that were never designed to talk
- Retry and replay logic for failed steps
- Rate-limit handling and backoff against third-party APIs
Not included
- Automations with no error path defined
- Direct contact with your client's other vendors
- Data cleansing of an existing, unmaintained dataset
- Ongoing workflow babysitting after handover
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- Integration work is spiky by nature. Senior capacity when a sync breaks or a new system needs connecting, without carrying a developer through the quiet weeks.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- The failure handling is the job. A workflow that works once in testing and an integration that survives a rate limit at 2am are different deliverables.
- Against an offshore shop
- One engineer owns the whole data path, so a partial failure gets traced by the person who built it, not relayed through a support queue.
Stripe & Billing Systems
We build subscription, usage-based and marketplace billing on Stripe and comparable providers (checkout, webhooks, entitlements, dunning and reconciliation) for the SaaS and product agencies where a billing bug is the one kind of bug a client cannot afford.
Billing is the one part of a product where a bug is indistinguishable from theft. Missed webhooks, mishandled proration and unreconciled subscription state do not throw errors. They quietly undercharge, overcharge, or leave cancelled accounts with full access for months, and nobody finds out until a client reconciles their revenue against the product and the numbers do not match.
- Who it is for
- SaaS and product agencies building or maintaining a revenue-generating product for a client.
- Typical timeline
- A standard subscription implementation runs two to four weeks. Metered billing, Connect marketplaces and migrations from an existing system take longer.
Included
- Stripe Checkout and customer portal
- Plans, tiers and entitlement mapping
- Signature-verified, idempotent webhook handling
- Upgrade, downgrade and proration logic
- Usage-based and metered billing
- Dunning, failed payments and grace periods
- Marketplace splits with Stripe Connect
- Multi-tenant billing architecture
- Paddle, Lemon Squeezy and PayPal as alternatives or additions to Stripe
- Reconciliation between processor state and application access
Not included
- Tax, accounting and financial advice
- PCI compliance certification
- Migrations away from Stripe to another processor
- Chargeback and dispute operations
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- Billing is a specialist problem a client hits once. Bringing in someone who has shipped it is faster and safer than a generalist learning Stripe's edge cases against live revenue.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- The webhook and reconciliation layer is where marketplace billing work usually stops, and it is exactly where revenue is lost.
- Against an offshore shop
- One engineer holding the whole billing lifecycle is how the subtle proration and dunning cases get caught before your client's customers find them.
Figma & No-Code to Production
We turn Figma files and Webflow, Bubble, Softr or Airtable prototypes into production applications with real backends, databases, authentication and scalable infrastructure, including SEO-preserving migration when a marketing site has to move with a client's rankings intact.
Two versions of the same problem. Either you have produced design work that needs a developer to build properly, or a client needs real auth, real data and real integrations, and your options are to say no or hand them to someone who might keep them.
- Who it is for
- Design, branding, Webflow and no-code agencies whose clients have outgrown the prototype.
- Typical timeline
- Marketing sites typically run one to three weeks. No-code-to-custom migrations with auth and data run three to eight weeks.
Included
- Pixel-accurate React and Next.js implementation from Figma
- Responsive behaviour across every breakpoint
- Accessible, semantic markup to WCAG standards
- Motion and interaction, including GSAP work
- Custom backend, authentication and database when Webflow, Bubble, Softr or Airtable run out
- Migration off no-code platforms into a real application
- SEO-preserving migration with redirect mapping
- Core Web Vitals work
Not included
- Visual design and art direction
- Copywriting
- Ongoing content updates after handover
- Work that a no-code platform's own tools already cover
Why this beats the alternatives
- Against hiring
- Front-end build volume is spiky. Senior implementation when a project needs it, without carrying a developer through the quiet months.
- Against a marketplace freelancer
- Accessibility, performance and redirect integrity are part of the deliverable, not things you find missing after launch.
- Against an offshore shop
- Design fidelity survives when the person reading the Figma file is the person writing the CSS. Every handoff between them costs accuracy.
Comparison
How this stacks up against the alternatives.
Every row here comes from the same comparisons on each capability above, consolidated into one table because that is the format you actually use to compare vendors.
| Hiring | Marketplace freelancer | Offshore shop | The SyncFlow | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to start | 6 to 12 weeks, recruitment cycle | Days, but unvetted | 1 to 2 weeks, through an account manager | Pilot milestone inside the first week |
| Cost when idle | Full salary, whether or not there is work | None, but no guaranteed capacity either | Retainer minimums in most contracts | None: paid per milestone, stop at any month end |
| Who you talk to | The person you hired, directly | Whoever won the job post | An account manager relaying to a developer | The engineer writing the code |
| Continuity between projects | High, if they stay | None: restarts from zero each time | Depends who you are assigned next time | Same engineer, standards carry across projects |
| Contractual protection | Standard employment terms | Platform terms only | Varies by shop | NDA, non-circumvention and IP assignment, signed up front |
| What happens when it goes wrong | A difficult conversation and a notice period | A dispute through the platform, if you are lucky | A ticket into a support queue | First milestone is risk-free; stop at any milestone after that |
Engagements
Three ways to work together. Start with the smallest.
Pricing is quoted per scope after the call, because a client portal and a Webflow migration are not the same job. You get a scoped quote within 24 hours.
Pilot milestone
The cheapest way to find out whether this works.
Typically 5 business days
- One defined, scoped deliverable
- Real code in your repository, not a proposal
- Loom walkthrough at delivery
- Risk-free: if it is not right, you do not pay
- No obligation to continue
Project build
A scoped build, delivered in milestones under your brand.
Typically 4 to 16 weeks
- Full scope agreed before the first milestone
- Milestone pricing fixed in advance, invoiced on delivery
- Daily overlap with your business hours
- Written updates plus a Loom at every milestone
- Work inside your Slack, GitHub and project board
- Documentation and handover at the end
- NDA, non-circumvention and IP assignment signed up front
Engineering retainer
A standing engineering seat on your team, month to month.
Monthly, cancel at any month end
- A reserved block of senior hours each month
- Maintenance, fixes and small features without re-scoping each one
- Priority on your queue ahead of new projects
- Attends your standups if you want them attended
- Roll work across multiple client projects
- Same NDA and non-circumvention terms
- No notice penalty when you stop
All three include NDA, non-circumvention, IP assignment and milestone payment terms. Get a scoped quote in 24 hours.
Send us the scope.
Describe what you sold and when it is due. You get a scoped quote within 24 hours of the call, and the first milestone is risk-free.